Mercedes GLC 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLC is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLC engine produces 61 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 155 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.7 | |
|
The Mercedes GLC is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes GLC consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Mercedes GLC over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes GLC gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes GLC 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is larger, but lower. Mercedes GLC is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes GLC is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 4 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 519 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1400 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLC is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Mercedes GLC can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 400 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |