Mercedes GLC 2016 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Mercedes GLC engine produces 10 HP less power than Jaguar F-Pace, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Jaguar F-Pace. Despite less power, Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Jaguar F-Pace version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from twelve 4x4 versions of Jaguar F-Pace 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 16 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLC might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2016 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. Jaguar F-Pace 2019 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar F-Pace 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is smaller. Mercedes GLC and Jaguar F-Pace are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1400 litres | 650 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLC is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace, which means Mercedes GLC can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`520 kg | 2`380 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`770 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 750 kg | 590 kg | |
| Mercedes GLC load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Jaguar F-Pace. Therefore, Mercedes GLC is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 200 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |