Mercedes GLC 2015 vs Jaguar I-Pace 2018
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | Electric | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 696 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 4.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar I-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes GLC engine produces 189 HP less power than Jaguar I-Pace, whereas torque is 346 NM less than Jaguar I-Pace. Due to the lower power, Mercedes GLC reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 23.6 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 13.10 € | 7.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 90 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 123 mm (4.8 inches) | 174 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar I-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Mercedes GLC 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes GLC 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is smaller, but higher. Mercedes GLC is 3 cm shorter than the Jaguar I-Pace, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes GLC is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 656 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1600 litres | 1163 litres | |
| Mercedes GLC has 106 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar I-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLC (by 437 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLC is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jaguar I-Pace, which means Mercedes GLC can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 2`670 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`660 kg | 2`133 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 740 kg | 537 kg | |
| Mercedes GLC load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem more than Jaguar I-Pace. Therefore, Mercedes GLC is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Mercedes GLC is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar I-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 200 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Jaguar I-Pace has
| |