Mercedes GLC 2023 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2024
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes GLC is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Skoda Kodiaq can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mercedes GLC also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 3.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 476 HP | 150 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 750 NM | 250 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.5 - 9 seconds | 6.3 - 9.9 seconds | |
| In general, Mercedes GLC are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Kodiaq. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.6 - 10.2 | 5.9 - 8.6 | |
|
Mercedes GLC petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Kodiaq. On average, Mercedes GLC equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is larger, but lower. Mercedes GLC is 3 cm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes GLC is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 545 litres | 910 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 2105 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Mercedes GLC uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 615 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`620 kg | ~ 2`353 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 39 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |