Mercedes GLC 2023 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2021
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes GLC is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Mercedes GLC also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 3.0 | 3.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 476 HP | 249 - 615 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 750 NM | 500 - 800 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.5 - 9 seconds | 4.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| In general, Land Rover Range Rover are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mercedes GLC. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.6 - 10.2 | 0.8 - 11.9 | |
|
Mercedes GLC petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. On average, Mercedes GLC equipped with diesel engines consume 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 158 - 300 mm (6.2 - 11.8 inches) | 284 - 295 mm (11.2 - 11.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Land Rover Range Rover can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.87 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 545 litres | 818 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1490 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. Mercedes GLC has 273 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Range Rover (by 351 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLC is 1.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Mercedes GLC can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`620 kg | ~ 3`453 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`042 kg | ~ 2`558 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 578 kg | ~ 895 kg | |
| Mercedes GLC load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 55 procentiem less than Land Rover Range Rover. Therefore, Land Rover Range Rover is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 64 200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |