Mercedes GLC 2016 vs Jaguar F-Pace 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes GLC is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Jaguar F-Pace has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mercedes GLC is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar F-Pace can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jaguar F-Pace also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 5.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mercedes GLC is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 - 510 HP | 163 - 500 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 - 700 NM | 365 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 3.8 - 8.3 seconds | 4.3 - 10.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 10.7 | 4.9 - 11.9 | |
|
Mercedes GLC petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar F-Pace. On average, a Mercedes GLC with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Jaguar F-Pace. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | 213 mm (8.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar F-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 2.07 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mercedes GLC is smaller. Mercedes GLC and Jaguar F-Pace are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 650 litres | |
| Mercedes GLC has 100 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar F-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes GLC (by 950 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLC is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar F-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`522 | ~ 2`464 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 28 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLC has
|
Jaguar F-Pace has
| |