Mercedes GLA 2020 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
Mercedes GLA is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLA engine produces 40 HP more power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Jaguar E-Pace. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLA reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 43 litres | 55 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase, Mercedes CLA | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.41 m | 4.40 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.98 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
Mercedes GLA is 2 cm longer than the Jaguar E-Pace, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes GLA is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | 1234 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1420 litres | 2577 litres | |
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes GLA has 809 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. This could mean that the Mercedes GLA uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 1157 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.46 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`135 | 2`400 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 36 000 | 19 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLA has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |