Mercedes GLA 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLA is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLA engine produces 47 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLA reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes GLA might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes GLA 2017 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Renault Kadjar 2015 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mercedes GLA is smaller. Mercedes GLA is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes GLA is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 421 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Mercedes GLA has 51 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLA is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Mercedes GLA can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | 1`946 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 21 800 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLA has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |