Mercedes GLA 2013 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mercedes GLA is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes GLA engine produces 26 HP more power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Renault Kadjar. Thanks to more power Mercedes GLA reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| 610 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase, Mercedes CLA | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mercedes GLA engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mercedes GLA is smaller. Mercedes GLA is 3 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes GLA is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 421 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Mercedes GLA has 51 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLA is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Mercedes GLA can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`920 | 1`903 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mercedes GLA scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Kadjar is better rated in child safety tests. The Mercedes GLA scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLA has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |