Mercedes GLA 2017 vs Seat Ateca 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.1 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 381 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 475 NM | 200 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 11.9 seconds | 8.3 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 4.3 - 5.3 | |
|
Mercedes GLA petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Ateca. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.60 m | |
| Mercedes GLA is 9 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes GLA is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mercedes GLA has 29 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ateca. This could mean that the Mercedes GLA uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLA is 1 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca, which means Mercedes GLA can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`002 | ~ 1`937 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLA has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |