Mercedes GLA 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.1 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 - 381 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 475 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 11.9 seconds | 9.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 4.9 - 8.3 | |
|
Mercedes GLA petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Mercedes GLA is smaller. Mercedes GLA is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes GLA is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Mercedes GLA has 69 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 747 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes GLA is 0.6 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mercedes GLA can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`002 | ~ 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes GLA has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |