Mercedes G class 2000 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Diesel | 4.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 560 NM | 560 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Mercedes G class and Mercedes ML have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes G class reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 10.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.7 l/100km | 12.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes G class consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes G class could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes G class consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes G class is 38 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 238 litres | 1061 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1580 litres | 2020 litres | |
|
Mercedes ML has more luggage space. Mercedes G class has 823 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes ML. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes ML (by 440 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Mercedes G class can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`850 kg | 2`870 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`475 kg | 2`260 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 375 kg | 610 kg | |
| Mercedes G class load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 63 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 50 800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes G klase has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |