Mercedes G class 1993 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000

 
Mercedes G class
1993 - 1996
Mitsubishi Pajero
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.4 Diesel3.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP165 HP
Torque: 305 NM373 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16 seconds13.8 seconds
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes G class engine produces 29 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 68 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Mercedes G class reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 14.110.5
Real fuel consumption: 14.1 l/100km10.4 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes G class consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes G class could require 540 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes G class consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Fuel tank capacity: 96 litres90 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
680 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.18 m4.80 m
Width: 1.69 m1.88 m
Height: 1.93 m1.86 m
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher.
Mercedes G class is 62 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero.
Gross weight (kg): 2`7103`300
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 28 2003400
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Pajero has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv