Mercedes G class 1993 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Mercedes G class engine produces 52 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 182 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.9 | 9.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes G class consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes G class could require 660 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.18 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.91 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes G class is 62 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |