Mercedes G class 1993 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.4 Diesel | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 305 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes G class engine produces 20 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 7 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.1 | 15.6 | |
|
The Mercedes G class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes G class consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Mercedes G class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes G class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes G class is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 21 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 830 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mercedes G class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 2`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 600 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes G klase has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |