Mercedes G class 1993 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 191 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Mercedes G class engine produces 50 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 152 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.0 | 9.5 | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes G class consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes G class could require 675 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes G class is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 1.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mercedes G class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 400 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |