Mercedes G class 1993 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes G class engine produces 48 HP less power than Mercedes ML, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Mercedes G class reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 17.0 | 13.5 | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes G class consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes G class could require 525 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.82 m | |
| Mercedes G class and Mercedes ML are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Mercedes G class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`500 | 3`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 30 400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |