Mercedes G class 1993 vs Nissan Terrano 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.7 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Nissan Terrano is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes G class engine produces 2 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, but torque is 7 NM less than Nissan Terrano. Despite the higher power, Mercedes G class reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.3 | 11.4 | |
|
The Nissan Terrano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes G class consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes G class could require 585 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 96 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.96 m | 1.81 m | |
| Mercedes G class is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Terrano, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1900 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 1.8 metres more than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Mercedes G class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`950 kg | 2`580 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`195 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 755 kg | 830 kg | |
| Mercedes G class load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Nissan Terrano. Therefore, Nissan Terrano is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 35 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |