Mercedes G class 1993 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.0 | 2.4 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 296 HP | 99 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 456 NM | 211 - 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 23.1 seconds | 10 - 25.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 - 16.7 | 11.0 - 14.5 | |
|
Mercedes G class petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Pajero. On average, Mercedes G class equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes G class is 51 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Mercedes G class can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`882 | ~ 3`073 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 28 200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |