Mercedes G class 1993 vs Nissan Patrol 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.3 - 5.0 | 2.8 - 4.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 - 296 HP | 130 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 456 NM | 252 - 363 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 23.1 seconds | 15 - 17.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 - 16.7 | 9.2 - 15.0 | |
Mercedes G class petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Patrol. On average, Mercedes G class equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.20 m | 4.42 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes G class is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 605 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1374 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Mercedes G class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`882 | ~ 2`734 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 28 200 | 9800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |