Mercedes G class 2000 vs Mercedes ML 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes G class is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Mercedes ML has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 5.0 | 2.3 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 - 296 HP | 150 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 - 560 NM | 220 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 - 13.2 seconds | 6.9 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 16.7 | 9.4 - 14.4 | |
|
Mercedes G class petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML. On average, Mercedes G class equipped with diesel engines consume 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.93 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes G class is 39 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 250 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Mercedes G class can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`810 | ~ 3`008 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes G klase has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |