Mercedes G class 1993 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 5.0 | 3.0 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 - 296 HP | 163 - 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 456 NM | 343 - 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 24.8 seconds | 9.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.1 - 17.0 | 9.0 - 13.6 | |
|
Mercedes G class petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Mercedes G class equipped with diesel engines consume 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes G class is 21 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 13.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 1.9 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mercedes G class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`311 | ~ 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |