Mercedes G class 2008 vs Land Rover Range Rover 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 3.0 - 5.5 | 3.6 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 211 - 612 HP | 272 - 510 HP | |
Torque: | 530 - 1000 NM | 510 - 700 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 - 9.1 seconds | 6.2 - 9.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 - 17.0 | 9.4 - 14.9 | |
Mercedes G class petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover. On average, Mercedes G class equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.97 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 2.03 m | |
Height: | 1.95 m | 1.87 m | |
Mercedes G class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes G class is 30 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes G class is 8 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 535 litres | |
Land Rover Range Rover has more luggage space. Mercedes G class has 55 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
Turning diameter: | 13.6 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes G class is 1.6 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover, which means Mercedes G class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`200 | |
Safety: | |||
The Land Rover Range Rover scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 111 200 | 13 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |