Mercedes E class 1993 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 54 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 57 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes E class consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Mercedes E class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes E class consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 600'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 960 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Mercedes E class is smaller, but slightly higher. Mercedes E class is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes E class is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 491 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes E class has 29 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 960. The Volvo 960 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |