Mercedes E class 1997 vs Opel Astra 2000
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Mercedes E class engine produces 23 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Opel Astra. Despite the higher power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes E class consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes E class could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes E class consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Astra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mercedes E class is larger. Mercedes E class is 69 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1180 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes E class has 150 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 1.2 metres more than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`740 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Opel Astra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes E class has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Opel Astra has
| |