Mercedes E class 1995 vs SAAB 9000 1993
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9000 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 20 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 40 NM less than SAAB 9000. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 11.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes E class consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000, which means that by driving the Mercedes E class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes E class consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9000) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes ML, Mercedes Vito | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes E class is 4 cm longer than the SAAB 9000, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.4 metres more than that of the SAAB 9000, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |