Mercedes E class 1995 vs Opel Astra 2002
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.4 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Opel Astra is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 30 HP less power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Opel Astra. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.3 | |
|
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes E class consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes E class could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Astra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Astra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mercedes E class is larger. Mercedes E class is 69 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1180 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes E class has 150 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 1.2 metres more than that of the Opel Astra, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Opel Astra has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes E class has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Opel Astra has
| |