Mercedes E class 1995 vs Volvo 960 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.9 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mercedes E class) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo 960) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 109 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 117 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 7.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 12.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes E class consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Mercedes E class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes E class consumes 4.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo 960 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
| Mercedes E class is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 491 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes E class has 24 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 960. The Volvo 960 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 1.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |