Mercedes E class 1995 vs Rover 75 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 21 HP less power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Rover 75. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes E class consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes E class could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes E class consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Rover 75) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes E class is 5 cm longer than the Rover 75, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 432 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes E class has 83 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.1 metres less than that of the Rover 75. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Rover 75 has
| |