Mercedes E class 1995 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 216 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 34 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Mazda Xedos 9. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.4 | |
| Mercedes E class consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the Mercedes E class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda Xedos 9) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 580'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Xedos 9 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda MX-6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
| Mercedes E class is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 9, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 430 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes E class has 85 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. The Mazda Xedos 9 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |