Mercedes E class 1993 vs Volvo 940 1992
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 113 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 17 seconds | |
Mercedes E class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes E class engine produces 31 HP more power than Volvo 940, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Volvo 940. Thanks to more power Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.44 m | |
Mercedes E class is smaller, but higher. Mercedes E class is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo 940, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes E class is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 992 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
885 litres | 2125 litres | |
Volvo 940 has more luggage space. Mercedes E class has 462 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 1240 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | above average | |
Mercedes E class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 940 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2800 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |