Mercedes E class 1997 vs Volvo S70 1999

 
Mercedes E class
1997 - 1999
Volvo S70
1999 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel2.5 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 177 HP140 HP
Torque: 330 NM290 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds10.7 seconds
Mercedes E class is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes E class engine produces 37 HP more power than Volvo S70, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volvo S70. Thanks to more power Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.67.3
The Volvo S70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes E class consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes E class could require 195 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 810 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1270 km on highway
Volvo S70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S70) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 630'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years6 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes S klase, Mercedes G klaseInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo 850
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo S70 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.82 m4.72 m
Width: 1.80 m1.76 m
Height: 1.50 m1.39 m
Mercedes E class is larger.
Mercedes E class is 10 cm longer than the Volvo S70, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 11 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 600 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1975 litresno data
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes E class has 130 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S70.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volvo S70, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`3101`600
Safety:
Quality:
average

low
Mercedes E class has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S70 has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably better
Average price (€): 42001200
Rating in user reviews: 9.0/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Mercedes E klase has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo S70 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv