Mercedes E class 1997 vs BMW 3 series 2000
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 20 HP less power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 10 NM more than BMW 3 series. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes E class consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes E class could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes E class consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes E class engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes ML, Mercedes Vito | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW Z4, BMW Z3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mercedes E class is larger. Mercedes E class is 35 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 600 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1975 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes E class has 160 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 1.3 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`150 | 1`925 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes E class has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |