Mercedes E class 1999 vs Opel Omega 2001
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
Diesel (Mercedes E class) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Opel Omega) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 197 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 470 NM | 290 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Mercedes E class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes E class engine produces 21 HP less power than Opel Omega, but torque is 180 NM more than Opel Omega. Despite less power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 11.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 11.8 l/100km | |
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes E class consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the Mercedes E class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes E class consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.90 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes E class is 6 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 600 litres | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1975 litres | 1800 litres | |
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes E class has 60 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The Opel Omega may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes E class (by 175 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.3 metres more than that of the Opel Omega. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`305 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
Opel Omega has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes E class has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Opel Omega has
| |