Mercedes E class 1999 vs Ford Mondeo 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Double-row timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 226 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 22 HP less power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.3 | 10.3 | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes E class consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes E class could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Mondeo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 450'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Mercedes SL | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes E class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
Mercedes E class is 4 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes E class is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 600 litres | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1975 litres | 1700 litres | |
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes E class has 60 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes E class (by 275 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`165 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Mercedes E class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |