Mercedes E class 1999 vs Kia Clarus 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 171 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Mercedes E class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes E class engine produces 37 HP more power than Kia Clarus, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Kia Clarus. Thanks to more power Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.3 | |
|
The Kia Clarus is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes E class consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Clarus, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes E class could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Clarus) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Optima, Kia Carens, Kia Magentis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Kia Clarus might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mercedes E class is larger. Mercedes E class is 9 cm longer than the Kia Clarus, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 600 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 1580 litres | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes E class has 296 litres more trunk space than the Kia Clarus. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes E class (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.7 metres more than that of the Kia Clarus, which means Mercedes E class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`250 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Kia Clarus has
| |