Mercedes E class 2013 vs Volvo V70 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 184 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 56 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 8.4 | |
The Mercedes E class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes E class consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Mercedes E class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
Mercedes E class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V70) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Mercedes E klase 2013 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes E klase 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.91 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.55 m | |
Mercedes E class is 9 cm longer than the Volvo V70, width is practically the same , while the height of Mercedes E class is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 575 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1950 litres | 1580 litres | |
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes E class has 120 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes E class (by 370 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`240 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes E class has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 12 800 | 8600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |