Mercedes E class 2016 vs Volvo S90 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes E class engine produces 66 HP less power than Volvo S90, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo S90. Due to the lower power, Mercedes E class reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo S90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes E class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Mercedes E klase 2016 2.0 engine: This engine is economical for its power output but has several notable weaknesses. Problems with variable valve timing regulators (phasors) are common, often requiring attention due to malfunctions. The timing ... More about Mercedes E klase 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.92 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes E class is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes E class is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 461 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1470 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes E class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes E class has 79 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S90. The Volvo S90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 250 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 238.4 metres less than that of the Volvo S90, which means Mercedes E class can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`245 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | 36 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |