Mercedes E class 1989 vs Opel Omega 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes E class
1989 - 1993
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Mercedes E class is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Opel Omega can be equipped only with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.22.0 - 5.7

Performance

Power: 75 - 220 HP100 - 310 HP
Torque: 126 - 310 NM203 - 450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 21.7 seconds7 - 16 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.2 - 11.96.7 - 14.0
Mercedes E class petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. On average, Mercedes E class equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.90 m
Width: 1.74 m1.78 m
Height: 1.49 m1.50 m
Mercedes E class is smaller.
Mercedes E class is 14 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes E class is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1800 litres
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.2 metres more than that of the Opel Omega.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`826~ 2`274
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
Average price (€): 66001200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes E klase has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Opel Omega has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv