Mercedes E class 1989 vs Mazda 626 1988

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes E class
1989 - 1993
Mazda 626
1988 - 1992
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Mercedes E class is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.21.8 - 2.2

Performance

Power: 75 - 220 HP61 - 116 HP
Torque: 126 - 310 NM121 - 178 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 21.7 seconds10.5 - 20.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.2 - 11.96.9 - 9.2
Mercedes E class petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Mercedes E class equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.76 m4.59 m
Width: 1.74 m1.69 m
Height: 1.49 m1.46 m
Mercedes E class is larger.
Mercedes E class is 17 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`826~ 1`066
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

above average
Average price (€): 66002200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes E klase has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • fewer faults
Mazda 626 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv