Mercedes E class 1989 vs Mazda 626 1988
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Mercedes E class is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 626 can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 | 1.8 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 - 220 HP | 61 - 116 HP | |
Torque: | 126 - 310 NM | 121 - 178 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 21.7 seconds | 10.5 - 20.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 11.9 | 6.9 - 9.2 | |
Mercedes E class petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Mercedes E class equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.76 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
Mercedes E class is larger. Mercedes E class is 17 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes E class is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes E class is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`826 | ~ 1`066 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes E klase has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |