Mercedes CLS 2019 vs Ford Mustang 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mercedes CLS) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Mustang) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 317 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 432 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLS engine produces 123 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLS reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 59 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes CLS is 22 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLS has 112 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`410 | 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 48 000 | 37 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLS has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |