Mercedes CLS 2018 vs Ford Mustang 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mercedes CLS) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Mustang) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 317 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 432 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 5.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLS engine produces 72 HP less power than Ford Mustang, but torque is 68 NM more than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 9.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 59 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes CLS is 22 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 408 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`445 | 1`653 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 48 000 | 38 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Mustang has
| |