Mercedes CLS 2004 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 272 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes CLS engine produces 32 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 77 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 13.0 | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLS consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mercedes CLS is 15 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLS has 155 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`195 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLS has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |