Mercedes CLS 2006 vs Peugeot 407 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 224 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 540 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLS is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLS engine produces 20 HP more power than Peugeot 407, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Peugeot 407. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLS reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes CLS consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLS consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 407) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes CLS) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes G klase | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mercedes CLS 2006 3.0 engine: A reliable yet dynamic engine. Frequent oil leaks, engine crankcase ventilation problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Mercedes CLS is 9 cm longer than the Peugeot 407, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 400 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLS has 105 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 407. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLS is 0.5 metres less than that of the Peugeot 407, which means Mercedes CLS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`280 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Mercedes CLS has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 407 has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Mercedes CLS, so Mercedes CLS quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLS has
|
Peugeot 407 has
| |