Mercedes CLS 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011

 
Mercedes CLS
2010 - 2014
Chevrolet Camaro
2011 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.5 Petrol3.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 306 HP312 HP
Torque: 370 NM377 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.1 secondsn/a seconds
Mercedes CLS engine produces 6 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.811.1
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLS consumes 4.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 645 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres72 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
1090 km on highway850 km on highway
Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 15 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes SLKUsed also on Chevrolet Equinox
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.94 m4.84 m
Width: 1.88 m1.92 m
Height: 1.42 m1.38 m
Mercedes CLS is 10 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 520 litres320 litres
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes CLS has 200 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro.
Turning diameter: 11.2 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`2201`700
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 13 80016 400
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLS has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv