Mercedes CLS 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mercedes CLS) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Camaro) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 323 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes CLS engine produces 58 HP less power than Chevrolet Camaro, but torque is 342 NM more than Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Mercedes CLS is 10 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLS has 156 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 600 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLS has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |