Mercedes CLS 2014 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 333 HP | 328 HP | |
| Torque: | 480 NM | 377 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.3 seconds | 6.2 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLS is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLS engine produces 5 HP more power than Chevrolet Camaro, whereas torque is 103 NM more than Chevrolet Camaro. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 10.9 | |
|
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLS consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
| Mercedes CLS is 10 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 364 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLS has 156 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 21 600 | 17 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLS has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |