Mercedes CLS 2014 vs Ford Mustang 2017

 
Mercedes CLS
2014 - 2017
Ford Mustang
2017 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel5.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 252 HP421 HP
Torque: 620 NM530 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.7 seconds4.8 seconds
Ford Mustang is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes CLS engine produces 169 HP less power than Ford Mustang, but torque is 90 NM more than Ford Mustang. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLS reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.212.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km12.5 l/100km
The Mercedes CLS is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mercedes CLS consumes 5.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLS over 15,000 km in a year you can save 870 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLS consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres59 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle490 km in combined cycle
670 km with real consumption470 km with real consumption
Mercedes CLS gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.94 m4.78 m
Width: 1.88 m1.92 m
Height: 1.42 m1.38 m
Mercedes CLS is 15 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLS is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 475 litres408 litres
Mercedes CLS has more luggage capacity.
Mercedes CLS has 67 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang.
Turning diameter: 11.5 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`4001`732
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 27 40038 000
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLS has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Ford Mustang has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv