Mercedes CLS 2014 vs BMW 5 series 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLS engine produces 20 HP less power than BMW 5 series, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLS reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLS consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLS could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLS consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1530 km in combined cycle | |
1430 km on highway | 1650 km on highway | ||
830 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLS might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Mercedes CLS 2014 2.1 engine: The engine has a long service life if it is serviced on time and has reasonable fuel consumption. The most common problems are caused by the engine chain tensioner and the fuel delivery system. BMW 5 sērija 2016 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2016 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.95 m | 4.94 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
Mercedes CLS is larger, but lower. Mercedes CLS and BMW 5 series are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 476 litres | 570 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1550 litres | 1700 litres | |
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Mercedes CLS has 94 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 5 series (by 150 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLS is 0.9 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Mercedes CLS can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`390 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 26 200 | 25 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLS has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |