Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 2003

 
Mercedes CLK
1999 - 2002
Mercedes CLK
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.4 Petrol5.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 347 HP367 HP
Torque: 510 NM510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.2 seconds5.4 seconds
Mercedes CLK 2003 is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes CLK 1999 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mercedes CLK 2003, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.712.3
The Mercedes CLK 1999 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLK 1999 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2003, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK 1999 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 520 km in combined cycle500 km in combined cycle
720 km on highway690 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.64 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 1999 is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK 2003, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK 1999 is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data276 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data390 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes CLK 2003.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0802`225
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 44006000
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Mercedes CLK has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv